Teaching Students How To Learn, Not Just What To Learn
Halfpoint/Shutterstock
The First-Year Experience
The students are engaged, thoughtful, and even dazzling in their discourse. Every faculty member has encountered these students in their first-year classes. Their comments are perceptive, their questions are leading, and their ability to engage other students is uncanny. There is every reason to believe the semester will go well for these students who, undoubtedly, have impressed faculty as exemplars of successful first-year students. Then, the first paper is submitted, or the first exam is taken, and something does not connect with the 'performance' in the class arena. The thinking that seemed so present in conversation is thin on the delivered assignments. The readings appear to have been skimmed rather than consumed in a critical manner. Hours of studying have produced evidentiary effort, yet this effort falls short of command of the subject matter. Higher education leaders often call this effort a type of underperformance, as if the mystery of this underperformance were entirely motivational. More often, it is educational missteps in discerning learning voids that students bring into the first-year experience. Most students bring the capacity to learn but .
The Gap Between Promise and Preparation
Far too often, when students enter the first-year experience in higher education, the mark for successful outcomes is missed with traditional assumptions. The traditional assumptions surrounding readiness of first-year students as self-evident. Foundationally, such assuming is dramatically fallacious. Students arrive and [some] faculty and academic support staff proceed as though all students understand what it means to read deeply, take useful notes, manage complex assignments, study for understanding, and recognize when confusion has begun to harden into avoidance. Based on first-semester and first-year retention rates, far too many students do not arrive as assumed. Simply put, these are the learning voids between promise and preparation. Students may never have been asked to read a dense text slowly enough to hear its argument. Others may have succeeded for years by memorizing quickly and forgetting just as quickly. Others may believe that sitting with notes for three hours is the same thing as learning. None of this means these students are incapable of effective learning. It means they are carrying learning voids into spaces that rarely acknowledge that the learning voids exist. Colleges and universities are adept at measuring performance. They are less adept at noticing and implementing strategies for addressing the invisible and visible absences of support that shape performance.
Who Are the Effective Learners?
Effective learners are not the students for whom college and university work comes easily. Nor is it the students who appear most polished, confident, or lucid in the rituals of academic life. Effective learners are the ones who have an understanding of when learning does not come easily and understand the importance of reaching for assistance. Effective learners slow down while reading and ask what the author is claiming. Students:
- Test recall instead of simply rereading.
- Notice the difference between repeating the definition of a term and being able to use it.
- Stop highlighting every line and start writing a sentence in the margin after each page.
- Go to office hours not to plead for points, but to ask why an argument did not hold.
- Begin to receive feedback not as judgment, but as information.
- These are humble acts. These are transformative acts.
Effective learning is often the accumulated result of such decisive actions, repeated until they become habit. The shift can look deceptively small, yet it is the foundation for successful outcomes.
The Institutional Blind Spot
These are the areas where higher education leaders must look directly into the "eye of the storm" rather than look away. When students struggle, there is too often a narrative of the problem as students' lack of discipline, resilience, or personal responsibility. Sometimes, of course, all those things can be true, yet often the more difficult truth is that colleges and universities do not successfully mitigate these ongoing -- year over year -- learning voids of first-year students. Traditional assumptions must be removed. We can't assume students know how to:
- Read in a discipline.
- Prepare for a cumulative exam.
- Move from summary to analysis.
- Recover after poor performance.
These assumptions function as a kind of hidden curriculum, and like most hidden curricula, they tend to reward the students who have already encountered them elsewhere. The work of 四虎影视, then, is not only to deliver content but also to make visible the intellectual practices the institution too often leaves implicit. A first-year seminar that teaches students how to approach a difficult text, a gateway course that builds in low-stakes retrieval practice, an instructor who explains why one study strategy works better than another -- these are not remedial gestures. These are acts of academic honesty. These acts acknowledge that learning is not magic and that students' success depends, in part, on whether higher education leaders are willing to teach the conditions that make it possible.
Learning as Becoming
Students whose promise falters on delivered assignments are not necessarily less capable than students who have mastered the performance of readiness. More often, those students who falter have not yet been taught how to convert ability into method. Effective learning is not a privilege reserved for those who arrive already fluent in academic culture. It is a set of practices, dispositions, and forms of self-knowledge that can be cultivated. The question for colleges and universities is whether they want merely to identify the students who already possess those tools or whether they are willing to help more students acquire them. The answer to that question may determine not only who succeeds but also who higher education leaders believe should be recipients of a college/university education.
